Overview
Program hub with full DOCX content, diagrams, comparison, and delivery plan.
What you’re looking at
Full contents included- Project Scope (SoW) — telemetry initiative scope.
- Approach 1 — LLM‑First (controlled) transition architecture.
- Approach 2 — deterministic-first target architecture.
- System design diagram — enhanced image of Fig 2.0.
- Comparison — deltas + recommendation with an evidence-backed decision matrix.
- Delivery plan — user-wise task allocation and sprint Gantt chart.
Primary risk control
“LLMs assist, never authorize”; deterministic successor required.
Authoritative core
Semantic layer as IP; governed promotion pipeline.
Fast path
Deterministic ingestion + schema enforcement for replayability.
Outcome
Process discovery, automation potential, dashboards & agents.
Quick navigation
Start hereScope of WorkSoW
Approach documentsDocx
Comparison & RecommendationDelta
Delivery planGantt
Program context (quick tabs)
Leadership + deliveryVision
Capture fine-grained user activity telemetry (apps, windows, timestamps) and convert it into sessions and business intent. Use this to reveal process friction, rework, and automation opportunities—while keeping privacy and governance as first-class constraints.
- Outputs: dashboards, process maps/heatmaps, automation opportunity rankings.
- Success: high intent/session accuracy, measurable reduction in context switching and friction.
Architecture
- Endpoint: Telemetry Agent → Local aggregation → Session pre-processing.
- Ingestion: Secure API + deterministic schema enforcement → raw + session stores.
- Intelligence: Sessionisation rules/DSL → activity classification → intent inference.
- Consumption: KPI engine → dashboards/APIs → agentic applications.
The system-design page shows the same flow as a color-coded SVG.
Semantic Layer
This is the organisation’s “process intelligence core”—the governed layer that turns telemetry into reusable knowledge.
- Reference DB: standards, subprocess maps, known activities.
- Correlation DB: patterns, signatures, cross-user sequences.
- Feedback DB: human validation + agent feedback + rule adjustment logs.
- Enterprise memory: knowledge graph + process intelligence store for reuse at scale.
LLM Philosophy
LLMs can accelerate discovery and explanation, but must not become the source of truth. Anything compliance-grade must be reproducible and auditable.
- Approach 1: LLM outputs are provisional and must be promoted into deterministic rules/ML before they are authoritative.
- Approach 2: deterministic-first; LLMs are optional and never define truth.
Agents
Agents are guard-railed: they observe, recommend, and learn under governance—never self-authorize changes.
- Observation Agent: monitors workflows and KPI changes.
- Recommendation Agent: proposes next-best actions / automation candidates.
- Learning + Audit: improvements are logged, reviewed, and promoted via governance gates.
Developers
- Keep ingestion + event schemas deterministic for replayability and testing.
- Version rules/DSL; add observability (logs, traces, audit).
- Use LLMs only as non-authoritative helpers (summaries/naming) with expiry + promotion workflow.
Delivery Plan page includes sprint-by-sprint ownership and a readable Gantt chart.
Program Deep‑Dive
Vision
Content aligned to this section is described across the system design and delivery guidance.
Architecture
Content aligned to this section is described across the system design and delivery guidance.
Semantic Layer
LLM Philosophy
Allowed (offline, assistive): Label summarization Analyst explanation Documentation Never allowed: Raw telemetry interpretation Core classification Workflow discovery
Agents
Developers
Content aligned to this section is described across the system design and delivery guidance.